🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect women from violence, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The final authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop laws and assistance programs to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked broad outcry both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Possible Next Steps

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the convention in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially send back the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect similar discussions in other EU countries